Define Salt water
Picture paints
as many words
as the painter
paints into
the picture
this picture is painted two ways and so the three are the one with which the story is told
read right to left to invert the left to right reading
addition and multiplication are
inverted answers answering
the invert of invers ion to
the complete set of set ness
or the null set of set naught
ness
where ent is the Σ
of the #3
and
the ty of #3
is the
Σηπ
οφ
#3
;;;
...In order to understand Mr Wittgenstein's book, it is necessary to realize
what is
the problem with which he
is concerned.
In the part of his theory which deals with Symbolism he is concerned with the
conditions which
would have to be
fulfilled
by a
logically
perfect
language
There are various problems as regards language.
First
, there is the problem
what
actually occurs in our
mind
s
when
we
use
language
with
the
intention
of
meaning
something
by
it;
this problem belongs to psychology.
My two cents here
if
the intention of meaning
it by something
is the
some thing meant by the mean
ing of it
than this is it
aka the ing of some thing
and this is that some thing
somehow allora
it is equal to some th
inging
which is why you always need to gnow
who is on first
what is on second
idaho is on third
you are the pitcher
you sleeping catch rye regularly
uncle lou is the er biter the um
pi
er
who pi s the um into er
letting you and the rest of us know what is what
when the who is rounding the corner and the
when is waiting for the bus on sunset strip
why who only knows when
when gives the signal up
to the bus driver and causes
the train to de rail
Secondly, there is the problem as to what is the relation subsisting between thoughts, words, or sentences, and that which they refer to or mean; this problem belongs to epistemology. Thirdly, there is the problem of using sentences so as to convey truth rather than falsehood; this belongs to the special sciences dealing with the subject-matter of the sentences in question. Fourthly, there is the question: what relation must one fact (such as a sentence) have to another in order to be capable of being a symbol for that other? This last is a logical question, and is the one with which Mr Wittgenstein is concerned. He is concerned with the conditions for accurate Symbolism, i.e. for Symbolism in which a sentence "means" something quite definite. In practice, language is always more or less vague, so that what we assert is never quite precise. Thus, logic has two problems to deal with in regard to Symbolism: (1) the conditions for sense rather than nonsense in combinations of symbols; (2) the conditions for uniqueness of meaning or reference in symbols or combinations of symbols. A logically perfect language has rules of syntax which prevent nonsense, and has single symbols which always have a definite and unique meaning. Mr Wittgenstein is concerned with the conditions for a logically perfect language—not that any language is logically perfect, or that we believe ourselves capable, here and now, of constructing a logically perfect language, but that the whole function of language is to have meaning, and it only fulfils this function in proportion as it approaches to the ideal language which we postulate....
INTRODUCTION
Comments
Post a Comment